Make your own free website on

Doug Mann LPN, LNC

The district's case for realignment

Home | Consumer Information | Resume | Education advocacy | Writings | Links | Nursing | Nursing Homes | French & Spanish | Modern Greek | Mann for School Board in 2008

The District administration's case for realignment

"In the past realignment has served to stabilize the desegregation schools (also referred to as "racially isolated") because realignment protects the more junior elementary teachers, who tend to be at those schools, from layoff.  That may be an advantage of realignment but there are certainly disadvantages." - Emma Hixson, MPS Executive Director of Employee Relations, in a message forwarded by Mary Brock to the MPS parents forum

Realignment was done to protect the jobs of elementary teachers on the low end of the seniority list, including probationary teachers, but it is not a very effective method of stabilizing the teaching staff in "racially isolated" schools. Student enrollment in elementary schools has declined substantially in elementary schools for the past 9 years, especially in schools where students of color are over-represented. The realignment of senior teachers created openings into which the junior teachers could bid. Some of those junior teachers obtained positions vacated by senior teachers in schools with a traditionally stable teaching staff (that are not racially isolated). And some of the positions vacated by senior teachers were in the same racially isolated schools.

Despite 9 consecutive years of substantial enrollment declines in the elementary schools, the district has been hiring elementary school teachers. And the new hires are mostly assigned to the "racially isolated" schools. The problem of high teacher turnover in the "racially isolated" schools persists, and the realignment policy, if anything, has helped to make matters worse, not better. The district drives up district wide teacher turnover rates by sending layoff notices to teachers who don't need to be laid off. Many find jobs as teachers in other school districts.

Without the excessive layoff notices, and without realignment across licensure areas, what would happen in the schools that are losing students and teaching positions? Teachers on the low end of the seniority list would be "excised:" Some might be able to bid into jobs in other buildings / licensure areas. The rest would be laid off. 

The district needs to take a closer and more serious look at why students are fleeing, or are being pushed out of the district's schools.  There have been changes in district's ability-grouping practices, attendance policies, discipline policies, and transportation policy that have contributed to the enrollment decline. The district could make changes in these areas that might help to turn enrollment loses into gains.

Re: Minneapolis public schools, board candidates, & the 2006 election